Love, attract, and the inhibition away from viewpoint off romantic selection

Love, attract, and the inhibition away from viewpoint off romantic selection

Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, Meters. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, M. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Development and you may People Behavior, 29(2), 119–126.

Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Meters. (2000). The place out of connection into the individual mating. Writeup on Standard Therapy, 4(2), 186–204.

Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, Good. (2002). Web sites paradox revisited. Record out of Social Factors, 58(1), 49–74.

Kraut, R., Patterson, Yards., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology you to minimizes societal engagement and you may mental better-getting? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.

Kreider, Roentgen.M., & Areas, J. Yards. (2001). Matter, timing, and you will time of marriage ceremonies and you may divorces. Latest Society Records, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, 2005).

Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional investigation regarding intimacy, passion, and union: Investigations the fresh presumptions of mail ordre brude definition your triangular theory away from like. Mental Profile, 90(3,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.90.step three.1009-1014

Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Age. (2004). Feeling better regarding doing worse: Social evaluations contained in this close matchmaking. Record out-of Character and Public Mindset, 87(1), 80–95.

Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A., & Gailliot, M. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The fresh new implicit knowledge out-of romantic competition. Journal from Identity and you will Societal Therapy, 97(1), 74–87.

An excellent. (2001)mitment and matchmaking fix components

Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. An effective., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automated inattention in order to glamorous solutions: The fresh new progressed mindset away from relationships repair. Development and you may Person Choices, 29(5), 343–349.

pold, B. Elizabeth. (1981). Sequential analysis out-of argument and agreement for the disappointed and nondistressed relationship people. Journal out of Asking and Health-related Therapy, 49(4), 554–567.

McKenna, K. Y. An excellent., Green, A good. S., Gleason, Yards. J. (2002). Matchmaking formation on line: What is the larger appeal? Journal of Social Affairs, 58(1), 9–31.

The advantages of positive illusions: Idealization together with framework out of satisfaction in intimate dating

Neff, L. A great., & Karney, B. Roentgen. (2002). Self-research objectives during the romantic relationships: A type of all over the world improvement and particular verification. During the P. Noller & J. Good. Feeney (Eds.), Understanding ents about examination of couples communications (pp. 32–58). New york, NY: Cambridge College Press.

Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the customer-counselor bond from the contact out-of attachment idea. Psychotherapy: Idea, Browse, Routine, Studies, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330

Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Brand new social keeping track of system: Enhanced susceptibility in order to personal signs because an adaptive response to societal exception. In the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The brand new public outcast: Ostracism, personal exception to this rule, rejection, and you can bullying (pp. 213–226). Nyc, NY: Therapy Force.

Enter, T., & Lydon, J. Age. (2001). Internationally and you will specific relational models in the exposure to public relations. Record off Character and you will Public Psychology, 80(4), 613–631.

Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A beneficial., Tran, S., ). Connection and you may recommendations trying to into the close matchmaking. Character and you can Personal Psychology Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.

Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and particular attachment representations into the adulthood: Can there be a romance?. Journal Of Public And private Matchmaking, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001

Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. From inside the J. Harvey & A great. Wenzel (Eds.), Personal personal relationship: Fix and improvement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schul, Y., & Vinokur, Good. D. (2000). Projection in person impression certainly partners because a purpose of the fresh similarity within their mutual enjoy. Character And you will Societal Mindset Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008

Seligman, C., Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, Meters. P. (1980). Outcomes of salience from extrinsic benefits with the taste and enjoying. Journal off Personality and you will Societal Mindset, 38(3), 453–460.

Laisser un commentaire