Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, Meters. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, M. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Development and you may People Behavior, 29(2), 119–126.
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Meters. (2000). The place out of connection into the individual mating. Writeup on Standard Therapy, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, Good. (2002). Web sites paradox revisited. Record out of Social Factors, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, R., Patterson, Yards., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology you to minimizes societal engagement and you may mental better-getting? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, Roentgen.M., & Areas, J. Yards. (2001). Matter, timing, and you will time of marriage ceremonies and you may divorces. Latest Society Records, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, 2005).
Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional investigation regarding intimacy, passion, and union: Investigations the fresh presumptions of mail ordre brude definition your triangular theory away from like. Mental Profile, 90(3,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.90.step three.1009-1014
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Age. (2004). Feeling better regarding doing worse: Social evaluations contained in this close matchmaking. Record out-of Character and Public Mindset, 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A., & Gailliot, M. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The fresh new implicit knowledge out-of romantic competition. Journal from Identity and you will Societal Therapy, 97(1), 74–87.
An excellent. (2001)mitment and matchmaking fix components
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. An effective., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automated inattention in order to glamorous solutions: The fresh new progressed mindset away from relationships repair. Development and you may Person Choices, 29(5), 343–349.
pold, B. Elizabeth. (1981). Sequential analysis out-of argument and agreement for the disappointed and nondistressed relationship people. Journal out of Asking and Health-related Therapy, 49(4), 554–567.
McKenna, K. Y. An excellent., Green, A good. S., Gleason, Yards. J. (2002). Matchmaking formation on line: What is the larger appeal? Journal of Social Affairs, 58(1), 9–31.
The advantages of positive illusions: Idealization together with framework out of satisfaction in intimate dating
Neff, L. A great., & Karney, B. Roentgen. (2002). Self-research objectives during the romantic relationships: A type of all over the world improvement and particular verification. During the P. Noller & J. Good. Feeney (Eds.), Understanding ents about examination of couples communications (pp. 32–58). New york, NY: Cambridge College Press.
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the customer-counselor bond from the contact out-of attachment idea. Psychotherapy: Idea, Browse, Routine, Studies, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Brand new social keeping track of system: Enhanced susceptibility in order to personal signs because an adaptive response to societal exception. In the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The brand new public outcast: Ostracism, personal exception to this rule, rejection, and you can bullying (pp. 213–226). Nyc, NY: Therapy Force.
Enter, T., & Lydon, J. Age. (2001). Internationally and you will specific relational models in the exposure to public relations. Record off Character and you will Public Psychology, 80(4), 613–631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A beneficial., Tran, S., ). Connection and you may recommendations trying to into the close matchmaking. Character and you can Personal Psychology Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.
Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and particular attachment representations into the adulthood: Can there be a romance?. Journal Of Public And private Matchmaking, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. From inside the J. Harvey & A great. Wenzel (Eds.), Personal personal relationship: Fix and improvement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, Good. D. (2000). Projection in person impression certainly partners because a purpose of the fresh similarity within their mutual enjoy. Character And you will Societal Mindset Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, Meters. P. (1980). Outcomes of salience from extrinsic benefits with the taste and enjoying. Journal off Personality and you will Societal Mindset, 38(3), 453–460.
